Modern medicine effectively treats cancer–True or False?
This may shock a lot of people, but let the truth be known.
One of the best large-scale studies on the effectiveness of chemotherapy treatments was published in 2004. Keep in mind that chemo remains the main weapon in the cancer war. It is used in 75 percent or more of cancer treatments.
This study was not conducted by some bitter scientist, but by two highly respected oncologists from Australia. They simply looked at the results of every randomized, controlled clinical trial performed in the U.S. between 1990 and 2004 which reported a statistically significant increase in five-year survival due to chemotherapy.
That is, they looked at the number of cancer patients who survived more than five years (the conventional medical definition of success) following diagnosis and treatment. Here are the results:
Bladder 00.0%
Kidney 00.0%
Melanoma 00.0%
Multiple myeloma 00.0%
Pancreas 00.0%
Prostate 00.0%
Soft tissue sarcoma 00.0%
Unknown primary site 00.0%
Uterus 00.0%
Stomach 00.7%
Colon 01.0%
Breast 01.4%
Head and neck 01.7%
Lung 02.0%
Rectum 03.4%
Brain 03.7%
Esophagus 04.9%
Ovary 08.9%
Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma 10.5%
Cervix 12.0%
Testis 37.7%
Hodgkin’s disease 40.3%
Overall survival rate for American adults 2.1%
What is the Modern “Track Record” of Chemo, Radiation, and Surgery?
Now with modern advancements in medicine, one would thnk that the “Big 3′ have improved the prognosis for cancer, right? Aren’t’ we curing a greater percentage of people with cancer now as compared to 1950?
The answer is a resounding “NO!” As a matter of fact, the track record of the “Big 3” is so pathetic that the Cancer Industry considers it a “success” if the survival rate of patients who take the “Big 3” actually matches the survival rate of patients who do nothing at all!
Each of those treatments is invasive, has devastating side effects, and treats only symptoms, not the cause of the cancer.
Cancer–Step Outside the Box, Page 109
The above quote comes from Ty Bollinger who wrote the forward for my Answer for Cancer: 9 Keys. Actually, Ty’s book is better and more thorough than my book. If you or someone you know is struggling with a cancer diagnosis, get Cancer-free, Step Outside the Box.
What Oncologists Know But Never Tell
The McGill Cancer Center in Montreal, Quebec, one of the largest and most prestigious cancer treatment centers in the world, did a study of oncologists [cancer treatment doctors] to determine how they would respond to a diagnosis of cancer.
On the confidential questionnaire, 58 of out of 64 oncologists (91%) said that ALL chemotherapy programs were unacceptable to them and their family members. The overriding reasons they gave for this decision were that the drugs are ineffective and have an unacceptable degree of toxicity.
Cancer-free, Your Guide to Gentle, Non-toxic Healing, page 74
Doctor, Would you take Chemotherapy?
A similar and more recent study conducted by the Los Angeles Times found that 75% of oncologists stated that chemotherapy and radiation were unacceptable as treatments for themselves or their families.
Cancer-free, Your Guide to Gentle, Non-toxic Healing, page 74
Does Modern Medicine Effectively Treat Cancer?
Why is the survival rate for cancer so low?
Why does cancer almost always come back after treatment?
Why do most oncologists refuse chemotherapy for themselves and their families?
Why did President Ronald Reagan go to Germany for his cancer treatment? What treatments are other nations using to fight cancer?
What natural treatments are proven effective against cancer?
We need to do some serious thinking about cancer and modern medicine.
Speak Your Mind